The AI Content Paradox: Why L&D Leaders Are Stuck in the Efficiency Trap

Despite massive AI adoption for content creation, L&D departments aren't achieving the strategic transformation they hoped for.

In a recent episode of the Instructional Designers in Offices Drinking Coffee (IDIODC) podcast, L&D researcher Donald H. Taylor made a striking observation: "AI is something which everyone likes to look at, but nobody actually invites to dance."

This paradox captures the current state of AI in eLearning perfectly. AI consistently tops "hottest trends" lists while being cited as the biggest challenge facing the industry.

According to Taylor's 2025 Global Sentiment Survey, Artificial Intelligence claimed 22.6% of votes as the hottest trend in workplace L&D. Yet 94% of respondents also cited AI-related concerns as their biggest challenge for 2025.

This disconnect reveals a fundamental problem. L&D leaders are trapped in what we might call the "efficiency ceiling." They're using AI to do the same things faster rather than doing fundamentally different things better.

‍

The Efficiency Ceiling: When Speed Becomes a Limitation

Taylor's research shows one finding that remains consistent across years. "Create learning content faster" consistently ranks as the #1 expected benefit of AI in L&D. In the 2024 Focus Report on AI in L&D, this efficiency-focused mindset dominated responses. Practitioners primarily use AI for content generation, learning design tasks, and research.

But here's the problem: focusing solely on speed creates an efficiency ceiling. This actually limits L&D's potential impact. When your primary goal is creating content faster, you're still operating within the same framework. You're just doing it at higher velocity — not fundamentally changing how learning happens or how L&D creates value.

This efficiency trap is particularly dangerous because it feels like progress. Teams celebrate reducing content development time from weeks to days. They create more courses than ever before. They generate learning materials at unprecedented scale.

Yet underneath this apparent success, a troubling pattern emerges. Despite all this efficient content creation, L&D departments continue to struggle with demonstrating business value. They lack strategic influence within their organizations.

‍

The "Value Trio" Returns: A Wake-Up Call

Taylor's research reveals something fascinating about how the industry is responding to this challenge. For years, three topics consistently appeared on his survey: showing value, consulting more deeply with the business, and performance support. He calls these the "value trio."

Last year, these three fell dramatically as AI sucked up all the interest. Everything else fell away. This year, only four things rose on the survey table. AI continued to rise, but those three value-focused areas bounced back strongly.

"It was almost as if the world was saying, yeah, we kind of got it wrong," Taylor explains. "Last year we were just in the headlights dazzled by AI. Now we're getting back to business."

This bounce-back signals something important. The industry is recognizing that AI alone isn't enough. You still need to focus on business value.

‍

Beyond Speed: Real-World Strategic Applications

The most successful organizations are breaking through the efficiency ceiling. They're using AI strategically, not just tactically. Consider these examples from Taylor's research:

Bayer's Compliance Revolution

Rather than simply creating compliance content faster, Bayer transformed their entire approach. They developed a secure large language model that generates role-based content. It also powers a virtual agent providing point-of-need procedural support.

The result? Dramatically reduced compliance onboarding time and improved retention of critical procedures.

Leyton's Performance Analytics

This consulting firm moved beyond content creation. They use AI for measuring coaching impact on customer conversations. By analyzing actual business conversations, they track how training translates into improved performance. They achieved a 50% increase in new joiner performance over five months.

Ericsson's Skills Intelligence

Rather than using AI to create more skills-based content, Ericsson implemented enterprise-wide skills intelligence. This maps capabilities across the organization, predicts future needs, and automatically suggests development paths. This shifts L&D from reactive content creation to proactive capability building.

These examples share a common characteristic. They required L&D to work closely with other parts of the business. They needed access to broader organizational data. They focused on business outcomes rather than learning outputs.

‍

The Current Reality: Most L&D Teams Are Still Experimenting

Taylor's separate AI in L&D Focus Survey reveals an interesting trend. For the first two years, more people said they were experimenting with AI rather than using it. But this year marks a huge shift. For the first time, people are saying "I'm actually using it."

Maybe extensively. Maybe lightly. Maybe piloting it. But they're actually using it — not just experimenting.

This shift raises important questions about what people are actually doing with AI in instructional design.

‍

‍

What Instructional Designers Are Actually Doing with AI

Based on Taylor's research, our own observations, and our customers feedback, here's how instructional designers are currently using AI:

Production and Media Creation

• Auto creation of audio narration

• Better text-to-speech than previously available

• Creation of images when graphic design resources are limited

• Translation services for content that previously wasn't translated due to budget constraints

• Adding closed captioning and accessibility features

• Writing alt text for images

Research and Preparation

• Researching topics and providing summaries

• Helping with learning objectives

• Prepping for subject matter expert meetings to make them more efficient

Content Generation (with significant caution)

Many designers report mixed results when using AI for direct content creation. As one participant noted: "I've seen some materials created. Even with citations and references... sometimes the references are referencing something else, and they referenced it wrong."

The consensus seems to be that AI works well for preparation and production tasks, but requires careful oversight for actual content creation.

‍

The Content Operations Shift: From Faster to Smarter

For L&D leaders responsible for content operations, breaking through the efficiency ceiling requires a fundamental shift in thinking. Instead of asking "How can we create content faster?" the question becomes "How can we create more intelligent content operations that drive business results?"

This shift involves several key changes:

1. Data Integration Over Content Generation

Instead of using AI primarily to generate new content, focus on integrating learning data with business data. This enables insights like:

• Which content actually drives performance improvements

• Which skills gaps correlate with business challenges

• Where learning investments generate the highest ROI

2. Predictive Analytics Over Reactive Development

Rather than waiting for stakeholders to request training, use AI to predict learning needs. Base predictions on business trends, performance data, and emerging skill requirements. This positions L&D as a strategic partner rather than a service provider.

3. Personalization at Scale Over Mass Production

While AI can help create more content, its real power lies in personalizing learning experiences. Base personalization on individual roles, performance data, career goals, and learning patterns. This requires sophisticated data analysis but creates exponentially more value than producing more generic content.

4. Business Impact Measurement Over Learning Metrics

Move beyond tracking completion rates and satisfaction scores. Measure actual business impact instead. AI can help correlate learning activities with performance improvements, productivity gains, and business outcomes. But this only works if you have access to the right data and analytics capabilities.

‍

Breaking Through: Building Cross-Functional Relationships

The most significant barrier to sophisticated AI implementation isn't technical — it's organizational. As Taylor's research consistently shows, moving beyond tactical AI use requires L&D to "get out of the department and work with others."

Engaging IT and Data Teams

Advanced AI applications require access to organizational data. They need integration with existing systems and robust security protocols. L&D leaders need to build relationships with IT and data teams early. Position yourself as a strategic partner rather than just another department requesting tech support.

Collaborating with Business Units

The most valuable AI applications address real business challenges. This requires L&D leaders to deeply understand business priorities, performance metrics, and strategic objectives. Regular collaboration with business unit leaders helps identify opportunities where learning technology can drive business results.

Securing Executive Support

Advanced AI implementations often require significant investment and organizational change. This necessitates executive sponsors who understand the strategic value of advanced learning technology. They need to champion necessary resources and changes.

‍

The Path Forward: Three Strategic Steps

Based on Taylor's research and the experiences of organizations successfully using AI strategically, L&D leaders can take three concrete steps to break through the efficiency ceiling:

Step 1: Audit Your Current AI Maturity

Honestly assess where your organization currently sits. Are you primarily using AI for:

• Individual productivity (creating content faster)

• Departmental enhancement (better analytics and curation)

• Organizational transformation (strategic business impact)

Understanding your current state is essential for planning your next moves.

Step 2: Identify Strategic Use Cases

Look beyond content creation to identify opportunities where AI could drive business value. Consider areas like:

• Skills gap analysis using performance and business data

• Predictive analytics for workforce development

• Personalized learning paths based on career progression and business needs

• Real-time performance support integrated into workflow

• Business impact measurement and ROI analysis

Step 3: Build Your Coalition

Start building relationships with stakeholders you'll need for advanced AI implementation. This includes:

• IT teams for technical integration

• Business leaders for use case identification

• Executives for strategic support and resources

‍

The Warning: Avoiding the "Beige Wave"

Taylor warns of a significant risk he calls the "beige wave" — a tidal wave of bland, AI-generated content. "It's very easy to produce and it might look quite slick, but it's not good instructional design," he explains.

‍

‍

The danger is that everyone else is also using AI to create learning materials. If L&D doesn't differentiate through good instructional design principles and business focus, they risk getting lost in a sea of mediocre content.

"In order to stand out, we have to have good instructional design," Taylor emphasizes. "We've also gotta be quite savvy about working with the business to make sure that we are showing value."

‍

Conclusion: From Efficiency to Impact

The AI content paradox facing L&D isn't a technology problem — it's a strategic one. While AI tools have made it easier than ever to create learning content quickly, the real opportunity lies elsewhere. It's about using AI to fundamentally transform how L&D creates value for organizations.

As Taylor's research consistently demonstrates, the L&D departments achieving strategic influence are those that move beyond efficiency gains. They focus on business impact instead. They use AI not just to create content faster, but to build more intelligent, data-driven, and outcome-focused learning operations.

The choice facing L&D leaders is clear. Remain trapped in the efficiency ceiling, celebrating faster content creation while struggling for strategic relevance. Or make the more challenging leap to strategic AI implementation that positions L&D as a true business partner.

For those ready to make this leap, the path is demanding but well-defined:

• Build cross-functional relationships.

• Focus on business outcomes over learning outputs.

• Use AI to create intelligence, not just content.

The organizations that make this transition won't just survive the AI revolution — they'll lead it.